Last video for today. But this one covers a plethora of other cool features that are being unveiled in 2012 (hopefully you are downloading it as we speak!).
Yet another awesome new toy from the lab for 2012. Assemblies is kinda like groups… except it’s totally not groups. And much better. And useful. And thus far actually stable… well. just watch and see for yourself!
Sad but true; this feature should have been around a LONG time ago. Combine this with the view specific create parts and you have yourself an uber detail production machine. I can tell you this feature will be getting a LOT of use in our office.
So it’s finally being downloaded by everyone on the face of planet BIM, which means I can officially, without legal issues, post these videos! The following are some videos demonstrating the new shininess the folks in the labs have given us this time around!
This is a really cool tool called Create Parts! Yes, that’s right, you can FINALLY create cutaway sections without some goofy workaround in Revit! Have fun tinkering!
btw: direct download link for Revit 2012 (courtesy of Whatrevitwants): http://revit.downloads.autodesk.com/download/2012RAC_RTM/Autodesk_Revit_Architecture_2012_English_Win_32-64bit.exe
This is an assignment i did back in school. It was actually for a psychology class but I was so fascinated with architecture at the time that I kept it related to my major. I did a poll of 150 subjects, 30% of which were familiar with the field of architecture, the remainder were not. I am still very proud of the resulting research and paper and I still use this today for much of my design work. Pardon the formatting of the images at the end; I found out today that WordPress, while awesome, has several character flaws *angry face*
Psychology of Architecture
An average population of the world views space and structure through the visual elements provided. Brick, tree, corridor, door, window, trim and carpet are only a few of these visual elements. All of the elements combine to allow us to experience a space. These experiences should be the designer’s goal when conceiving the space in question. Some spaces are created to encourage social interaction while others are designed to encourage silence and reflection. Think about the space that you are in now. If you are in an office, most likely it is institutionalized with a nominal amount of light and large capacity for production. Let’s say you are in a municipal park. Most likely you are relaxed and enjoying time away from the office and other stresses of life. It is the purpose of this paper to explore the relationships between these elements and how you experience a space. Specifically, we will look at color, space and extra-sensory perceptions that we have while experiencing a space.
To begin I would like to define architecture and explain why it is important to design with experience in mind. Here at Southern Polytechnique State University, it is engrained into architecture students that our definition of architecture is the following:
“Architecture is the blend of science, art and technology to provide a meaningful interaction between an audience and the space that they occupy.”
At least something to that extent! It may come to your attention that most of the buildings that you occupy are not really an experience. Unfortunately this is outside the scope of my research but I do intend to show why it is important for every space to be designed with a certain experience in the mind of its designer.
Let us suppose for one instance that the St. Louis Arch is one story tall. It would then be a completely different experience as it is today, and far from the desired experience of its designer. A space designed without an experience in mind is a space without a purpose that can leave its occupants lost and confused. Even a space as irrelevant as a high school locker room can be made relevant through the use of different colors.
Maybe one of the most powerful visual elements in a space is color. Like David Johnson states in Psychology of Color, “Like death and taxes, there is no escaping color.” Today there are so many for a designer to choose from that it can be an overwhelming decision to make. Color, as they say, can make or break a design project. While color should be thought of to make a building aesthetically pleasing (or unattractive if that may be the purpose of the design), color is much more important than mere aesthetics. Why is it that people feel more relaxed in a green room? Regardless of why, the fact is that we are and that is why television studios place guests in a “Green Room” before their appearance on live television. Color psychology is a difficult subject to tackle a paper as small as this one. Table (1) shows some of the more common colors with their respective psychological effects.
Color of power and authority. Absorbs light and dims a space usually making the space less desirable to occupy.
Reflects light and makes a space brighter and usually more pleasurable to be in.
Most emotionally intense color. Tends to cause a faster heartbeat and breathing. However, the most romantic color, pink, is used in guest team locker rooms to cause the team to loose energy. (Morton)
Opposite of red, causes body to produce relaxing chemicals.
Most popular color in decorating. Green is the most calming and refreshing color and can even improve eye health.
A cheerful color, yet it is more common for people to loose their temper in yellow rooms and babies tend to cry more. Yellow tends to increase metabolism.
“The color of royalty, purple connotes luxury, wealth, and sophistication. It is also feminine and romantic. However, because it is rare in nature, purple can appear artificial.”
Brown is the color of nature. Symbolizes strength and genuineness. Men are more likely to say that brown is their favorite color.
Table (1): Colors and their Psychological Effects
From Johnson’s Psychology of Color
Color can have a large variety of effects on the occupants of a space. As a designer conceives a space, the color should be used as a function of the space as much as the walls or ceilings. Yellow, for instance is a color that tends to grab attention more than other colors. This would make it a good color to use in corridors to show occupants where to go next. Since it also tends to increase metabolism, yellow should also be used in dining spaces such as restaurants. Along with color, spatial qualities can play a large role in how we experience a space.
You may ask, “How can you explain space, using space?” Well, let us say that the space we occupy is a general space that includes all elements. This general space is what we experience. The word ‘space’ that I use in the title refers to those individual elements that form the experience. These spatial qualities can be anything from wall texture or base molding to the size and shape of a space. Can these qualities of a space really effect how an audience experiences them? A recent study by Freemason Victor Popow looks at the possibility of humans being “physically wired” to recognize patterns and environmental cues while we occupy a space.
According to Gestalt psychologists, the mind is already programmed to recognize and classify patterns. It is thought that this programming is the result of million’s of years of learning how to react in different situations. This programming, according to the Gestalt’s, is the reason we act in awe at the tall vertical expanses of corporate buildings. Structurally complex buildings provide so much information for the mind to categorize and piece together that it creates a sense of wonder and excitement. Should you learn to behave in a massive cathedral space or should the space tell you how to behave? According to the Gestalt’s we already know how to behave in this environment because of inherited conditioning. It is this conditioning that the designer must take into consideration when planning a space.
The sensations that a space gives to the audience is just as important as the color, light or any other visible element. The third element that I wanted to introduce was the ‘extra-sensory’ element. This is not the ‘ESP’ that you normally associate with this term; it has nothing to do with telekinesis or mind-reading. To best explain this phenomenon I’d like you to try a little experiment (I’m not responsible for any injuries). After reading this sentence, close your eyes and concentrate on the following things: how big is the space you are in, what type of surfaces are around you and how high is the ceiling. You probably already know these things because you have taken that knowledge in through your eyes. Now close your eyes and this time walk to another room and think of the same elements. Notice that if you were familiar with the floor plan of the space you are in, you knew where to put your hand to feel your way into the next space, the general direction to go into as well as the general direction. Congratulations, you just had a spatial experience that required none of your five known senses, but a sense of how to put all that information together (sense of space).
Unfortunately, in the field of Architecture, it seems as though the five senses have been dimmed down to only one sense, visual. According to Rebecca Maxwell, visually impaired author and former teacher, “Architecture could delight us more by focusing on other senses indeed.” If we asked anyone to describe a building the response would most likely be of something they saw. Rebecca’s description of a building is almost always the floor plan. Once she has familiarized herself with the layout of a space (what she calls the first level of inner mapping) she moves on to the heights of the spaces. While she can not see the ceilings she can feel the openness of a room. A lower ceiling she says “has oppression… or a disproportion of the space.” This is one of those extra-sensory perceptions that must be considered when designing a space. Even for those of us that take visual information for granted every day can receive conflicting information from a space that is poorly designed to meet.
Now that I’ve laid all my beliefs and used what little research I could in order to support those beliefs, I would like to turn towards the survey that I have asked to see how relevant any of this may be. The goal behind my survey was simple: I am hoping to find what makes a person remember a building. Using this new information with the research above, I hope to shed some light on how to design a space that can be experienced, not just occupied.
As I had pointed out earlier, it appears as though a majority of the survey participants described a building that impressed them in visual terms. Even more impressive is that despite their differences, both male and female groups chose aesthetic features of a building that impressed them.
When asked to pick which space they would feel most comfortable in, the participants chose the space with the largest footprint. I am guessing that those that chose space 1 over space 3 chose it because of the apparently higher ceilings.
Blue is definitely more popular with males while green is much more popular with females. The color purple is less natural and therefore not thought of as a suitable environment color. This shows in these results. Dark colored rooms are usually synonymous with power and dominance which could be the reason more men chose this space.
Based on the survey results I gather that in general, most people expect certain things from spaces with elements arranged in a certain pattern. These expectations can help architects and other designers plan spaces that can be experienced rather than just occupied. By indulging in senses outside of the five primary senses, our spaces can be felt not only with our hands but with our sense of space. Colors can dictate different behaviors from one space to another. By knowing and understanding the pre-wired tendencies of humans, architects can design for the betterment of all humanity.
Sanders, Alan. Architecture and the Senses. 6 Nov. 2004. The Comfort Zone, Radio National. 1 Mar. 2005.
Johnson, David. Color Psychology. 2005. Infoplease.
Popow, Victor. A Report on Psychology & Architecture. Dec. 2000. (No known Affiliations).
Morton, J.L. Drunk Tank Pink. 2005. Color Matters.
So you may have been thinking: “Is this it? Is he done with tips? What do I do now!?” Well, no, I’m not done with tips. I’m just in the throws of trying to make this something I’ve always wanted it to be: a side job! I appreciate all the emails and comments of people wanting more tips from me, I really do. They make me enjoy what I do even more. Remember that you can always submit a question to be answered as a TotD by simply sending me an email. ‘Nough about that, let’s get on to your new tip!
When I last left you I was in the middle of a series for students doing conceptual massing… today is not the day to continue this, unfortunately. Instead I wanted to give you a nice quick tip that I’ve used quite a bit in my day. It’s a way to quickly create 3d sections without having to drag your section box grips all over your model. Feast your eyes, upon this beaut!
Aaaaand the proceeding steps for those that hate the sound of my voice.
Creating quick section 3Ds:
- Make a small selection group around the area you want to cut the section to. May work best to do this from a top or elevation projection of the 3d view.
- Isolate the Elements you’ve selected.
- Select the 3D View from the selection group filter.
- Turn the Section Box on. If the section box was already on, turn it off, then back on to reset it.
- Reset the Hidden Elements.
- TADA! Insta Section Box right where you wanted it!
It may take some practice to get used to this method but after some time you’ll be making 3d Sections exactly where you want them to be in you rmodels!
Well, that’s it for today. Thanks for stopping by and I look forward to seeing you around for the next RevitTotD! Remember that you can submit your questions to appear in a TotD video by sending me and email! Also be sure to find the RevitTotD page on Facebook!
A goody for you today, although I feel like I’m going to busy in the near future because of this one. I have 2 great new products for you to look at.
The first is a fun little light component. The Jelly Jar Light is a fun ceiling hosted light.
The second has me only slightly concerned. A Family Request product which allows you to submit your family requests.
I also want to take a second to invite anyone who has purchased a product in the past to please send me an email. I was just informed today that some purchases have not been going through as I had hoped. If you had an issue downloading a product after purchase, please send me a copy of your receipt and we can get it straightened out. Sorry for the inconvenience and I hope to get it straightened out soon!
Quick and dirty little family I whipped up for a RevitCity user. It’s a reveal that can be used to round off those wall corners. See more info here.
Reviters! I know you have all been waiting for a real reason to donate to me or purchase items from my store. Well now is your chance to not only have a piece of Revit history by owning your own Revittotd.com family, but also to donate to a great cause.
Starting now and ending May 1st, all donations and proceeds from the Revittotd.com store will go towards the Tour de Cure ride that I am participating in. The ride helps generate funds for researchers to help make the lives of diabetic Americans much easier. Donations of $5 or more are tax deductible as a charity donation and you will have your name placed on my Donator Roll on my tour page. All purchases of $5 or more (i know that’s hard to do since i only have $4 of families up there right now) will be tax deductible as a charity donation as well. All purchases below $5 will be donated as a lump sum on May 2nd to the charity.
As a bonus, I am setting up a little contest. It’s a donation contest and here are the prizes:
- First place is the person/company that donates the most total amount under the same name. You will receive a free Revit Rendering!
- Second place will receive a free custom Revit family of your choice!
Yeah, how’s about them stakes 🙂 Donations can be made through my donate now button or through the direct donate link below, but THEY MUST BE MADE UNDER THE SAME INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION NAME! Otherwise I have no way of knowing what the total donations are.
The ride is June 4th in Buffalo, New York. Any and all Reviters in the area around that time is more than welcome to come out and support us and meet us afterwards. Here is some information on the Tour de Cure organization. I am participating in the 63 mile ride and training is well under way!
If you feel like you want to support the cause but would feel better directly donating directly to the cause you can do so here.
Thanks for your time and I look forward to seeing your support roll in! 😀
OK, so I know you’ve just been dying to get a set of windows that go with those awesome doors I posted earlier. I also know that not having matching windows is the ONLY reason you havent bought the doors yet! Well, without further ado:
Single Panel Screened Window with Shutter
Double Panel Screened Window with Shutter
Enjoy, and thanks for stopping by!
Well, much more than just screened doors. These girls are sporting the works! Screened, Arched, Shutters… well just read this description!
Single Panel door with (2) screen panels (renders as mesh material). Arched blocking for shutter closure matches arch of shutters (which have matching paneling). This family contains a LOT of great features including:
- Version: Revit 2011
- Wall Hosted
- Individual Model and Plan swing angle parameters with equal switch
- Flexible shutter placement
- Flexible Arch Apex height
- Flexible Door frame location within wall
- Flexible framing depth and thickness
- All materials set with subcategories, assigned to geometries within family
- Contains 4 families: Package, Shutter, Door Panel, Door Swing Family
I mean, how could you NOT want this for just $0.99?! Comes in Single and Double varieties for your project needs!